Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] first weekend compiling gnuradio

[cfk]

Dear Matt & Stephanie:
    I used the command 'rpm -e swig' to remove swig from my RH9 system. Then
I downloaded swig-1.3.19.tar.gz from www.swig.org and expanded it. I then
configured it with "./configure --prefix=/usr" to put it in the same place
as the old one and ran "make && make install".

    At that point, I was able to successfully complete the make step with
gnuradio-0.9. This was followed by "make check" and it succeeds. I lastly
did a "make install" and it succeeds.

    I can now see in /usr/local/gnuradio/python/GnuRadio some files such as
GnuRadioPython.py. It isnt installed as with executable permissions, but I
did a chmod +x on it and then a ./GnuRadioPython.py (it doesnt appear in the
path), and of course the computer just sits there sticking out its tongue at
me.

    Would you be willing to help with a bit more advice for someone who has
just now gotten to the compilation step and doesnt yet know how to go "man
gnuradio".

Charles, WA6LWB


From: "Ettus, Matt" <address@hidden>
To: "'cfk'" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 11:25 AM
Subject: RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] first weekend compiling gnuradio


> You'll need to remove the swig 1.1 RPMS and install swig 1.3.19.  I've
never
> seen RPMS for it, so just get it from the swig website and install from
> source.
>
> Matt
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cfk [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 11:16 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] first weekend compiling gnuradio
>
>
> Gentlemen:
>     I seem to be stuck on the make step with gnuradio-0.9. One two
different
> computers, one RH8 and the other RH9, I have put gnuradio-0.9,
Numeric-22.0,
> wxPython-Src-2.4.2.4 and fftw-3.0.1. In both cases, the "make" fails with
> gnuradio after invoking swig on GnuRadio.i. It seems that swig feels
> GnuRadio.i's lines 81, 83, 86, 108, 109 and others are syntax errors. The
> first error occurs on the first typedef in GnuRadio.o. At first it was
> suggested that swig was the culprit on my RH8 system where the rpm -qa
> reports it is using swit-1.1p5-20. On the RH9 system, the swig is newer
and
> is swig-1.1p5-22. At this point, I am suspecting it is something other
then
> swig.