[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] hdtv hacking
From: |
Charles Swiger |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] hdtv hacking |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 18:49:07 -0400 |
> The most likely reason it doesn't pass, is that there is a 52
> segment delay between what you write into the interleaver, and what you
> get out of the deinterleaver. To work around the behavior, drop the
> first 52 segments of the output and then compare the remainder with
> the input.
>
Well - writing expected_results and result_data out to files
and manually comparing show they do match, so interleaver/deinterleaver
work - cool! (putting skip AFTER inter, deinter). I'll finish the
test code and move on to Trellis Encoder / Viterbi Decoder.
The latest benchmark I have for the 0.9 atsc is 10 minutes of data
takes about 14 hours to decode on an Athlon 3200+ (2200 MHz real),
and over HALF that time is spent resampling and up-mixing the data
to emulate an mc4020 to atsc_rx.
- [Discuss-gnuradio] hdtv hacking, Charles Swiger, 2006/04/07
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] hdtv hacking, Charles Swiger, 2006/04/07
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] hdtv hacking, Eric Blossom, 2006/04/07
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] hdtv hacking,
Charles Swiger <=
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] hdtv hacking, Michael Dickens, 2006/04/07
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] hdtv hacking, Eric Blossom, 2006/04/07
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] hdtv hacking, Jens Elsner, 2006/04/08
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] hdtv hacking, Martin Dvh, 2006/04/09
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] hdtv hacking, Eric Blossom, 2006/04/09
- [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: Viterbi Decoder, Michael Dickens, 2006/04/10
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] hdtv hacking, Eric Blossom, 2006/04/07
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] hdtv hacking, Charles Swiger, 2006/04/08
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] hdtv hacking, Charles Swiger, 2006/04/10