Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] problem building from cvs

[Eric Blossom]

On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:57:14PM -0400, Achilleas Anastasopoulos wrote:
> Eric,
> 
> I switched to a regular user as you suggested.

Thanks.  I feel better now.  I hope you do too ;)

> Here is the info you requested.:
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> address@hidden gr-build]$ autoconf --version
> autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59
> Written by David J. MacKenzie and Akim Demaille.
> 
> Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> address@hidden gr-build]$ automake --version
> automake (GNU automake) 1.9.5
> Written by Tom Tromey <address@hidden>.
> 
> Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> address@hidden gr-build]$ libtool --version
> ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.6 (1.1220.2.95 2004/04/11 05:50:42)
> 
> Copyright (C) 2003  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> --------------------------------------------
> Now after executing
> 
> ./for-all-dirs ../buildit 2>&1 | tee make.log
> 
> I get the same error with the attached make.log file.
> 
> Thanks
> Achilleas

OK, those all look good.  Thanks.

I did notice this oddity in your previous make.log:

  configure.ac:115: the top level
  configure.ac:26: version mismatch.  This is Automake 1.9.5,
  configure.ac:26: but the definition used by this AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
  configure.ac:26: comes from Automake 1.8.5.  You should recreate
  configure.ac:26: aclocal.m4 with aclocal and run automake again.
  src/lib/Makefile.am:32: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined
  src/lib/Makefile.am:32:

The comments about automake 1.9.5 vs 1.8.5 is odd.
Do (or did you) have both versions installed on your system?
Did they come from rpms's or were they built from source, or what?
Were they installed with the same prefix?
Seems like there must be bits and pieces from both on your system.

BTW, what version/distribution are you using?

Is the clock on your build machine set to a reasonable approximation
of the "right time"?  I.e., not off by hours or years.

Eric