discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed


From: Achilleas Anastasopoulos
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:45:14 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

Bob,

let me be 100% sure of what you are saying:

the comparison you are referring to was between
Phil Karn's native code in ANSI-C
and
Phil Karn's native code ported in Gnuradio ?

Thanks
Achilleas

Robert W McGwier wrote:
Yes. I was comparing Phil Karn's native code to it and it runs at least 20 times faster.

Bob



Achilleas Anastasopoulos wrote:


I have noticed a huge speed dissadvantage when comparing my
ANSI-C implementation of a Viterbi decoder with my Gnuradio implementation. The core code is pretty much the same, except
that in the Gnuradio implementation I am using STL vectors.

It seems that Gnuradio is about 20 times SLOWER than ANSI-C!!!
I was wondering if this has to do with Gnuradio itself (buffering +
python + other fat), or with the fact that I had to translate all
my ANCI-C code to C++ and use STL.

Does anyone have similar experiences?

Achilleas


_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio




--
_______________________________________________________
Achilleas Anastasopoulos                        
Associate Professor
EECS Department               Voice : (734)615-4024
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN        Fax   : (734)763-8041
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2122      E-mail: address@hidden
URL: http://www-personal.engin.umich.edu/~anastas/      
_______________________________________________________




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]