[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss-gnuradio] Comparison of filters in C++ vs Python
From: |
Jim Borynec |
Subject: |
[Discuss-gnuradio] Comparison of filters in C++ vs Python |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:29:36 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 |
Hi,
Has anyone determined the basic overhead of a filter?
I can't help but feel that stringing two filters in a row
(e.g. one to add a value and the other to multiply something)
would be less efficient than a single filter which does both operations
internally.
Does the overhead of a filter basically swamp the computation involved?
I understand the advantages of being able to quickly assemble a complicated
filter from simpler filters.
Also, has anyone quantified the cost advantage to using C++ (as compared to
Python).
Is a single Python filter (which does an add and a multiply internally) more
efficient than two C++ filters strung together?
j.b.
- [Discuss-gnuradio] Comparison of filters in C++ vs Python,
Jim Borynec <=