Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] updated packet format on USRP inband signaling

[Eric Blossom]

On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:12:23PM -0500, Brian Padalino wrote:
> On 2/25/07, Eric Blossom <address@hidden> wrote:
> >I guess I'm concerned that some of the OPS could take more than a
> >single tick.  E.g., I2C or SPI ops.  Thoses buses run at something
> >like 100kHz to 400kHz.  If all execution delays are known, then
> >OP_DELAY seems fine (and easy).
> 
> I share the same concern over the I2C or SPI ops, but I would think it
> is pretty easy for the host API for the daughterboard in question to
> have the delays hardcoded and figured out.  That would make it pretty
> easy to calculate violations within a TDMA sequence or frequency
> hopping scheme before it even gets down to the USRP.
>
> Brian

OK.  Sounds good to me.  I'll add OP_DELAY

Eric