discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Packaging GNU Radio for Fedora


From: Trond Danielsen
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Packaging GNU Radio for Fedora
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:42:34 +0100

2007/3/6, Eric Blossom <address@hidden>:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:38:51PM +0100, Trond Danielsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I creating a spec file for GNU Radio, and I discovered some minor issues:
>
> 1. Standard library paths are hardcoded into some of the libraries. I
> use this command in the spec file to fix libtool before building:
> sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g'
> libtool
> sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool

Just out of curiosity, how does _everybody_ else handle this problem?
I suspect that they're not editing libtool source.

Please take a look at the .spec files for other applications built
with autotools.

I am aware of that this solution looks a bit dirty, but it is actually
taken from the packaging guidelines on the fedoraproject wiki:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-a1dfb5f46bf4098841e31a75d833e6e1b3e72544

The message reported by rpmbuild is not an error; it is possible to
ignore it, but I wanted to do the right thing. Thats why I am asking.


--
Trond Danielsen




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]