[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re-writing blocks using intel libraries
From: |
Eric Blossom |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re-writing blocks using intel libraries |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:15:08 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 04:03:28PM -0800, Dan Halperin wrote:
> Eugene Grayver wrote:
> > Please see answers in-line.
> > Which blocks are causing you the biggest problem?
> >
> > I got a 2x improvement on all the filtering blocks. About a 40%
> > improvement for sine/cosine generation blocks. This includes gr_expj,
> > gr_rotate.
>
> I should mention that gr_rotate's performance can be _greatly improved_
> by a simple change that, rather than rescaling the multiplier every
> iteration, rescales every k, e.g. k=1000. I think I have an earlier
> mailing list post about this. IIRC, the patch didn't go in because there
> seemed to be no consensus about what k to use...
Ooops, sorry about that. Let me dig through the archived discussion
and we'll get it in.
Eric
- [Discuss-gnuradio] Re-writing blocks using intel libraries, Eugene Grayver, 2007/12/11
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re-writing blocks using intel libraries, Eric Blossom, 2007/12/11
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re-writing blocks using intel libraries, Eugene Grayver, 2007/12/11
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re-writing blocks using intel libraries, Eric Blossom, 2007/12/11
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re-writing blocks using intel libraries, Martin Dvh, 2007/12/11
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re-writing blocks using intel libraries, Tom Rondeau, 2007/12/12
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re-writing blocks using intel libraries, Martin Dvh, 2007/12/12
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re-writing blocks using intel libraries, Matt Ettus, 2007/12/11