Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Using rfx900 with usrp rev 3 (2005)

[Matt Ettus]

The newer way will have better phase noise.

Matt


Newell Jensen wrote:
> When doing this modification, is there any performance differences 
> between using a setup with this modification versus a newer USRP1 that 
> doesn't need this modification?  I think I had heard that the newer 
> USRP1 has better clock performance or something for the RFX900 boards 
> and didn't know how much a setup with this modification would perform 
> in comparison to a setup with a newer USRP1 (using the RFX900 boards).
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Matt Ettus <address@hidden 
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
>     Gohar wrote:
>
>         Hi,
>         Is it possible to use rfx900 with usrp rev 3 hardware that was
>         released in 2005? If yes, what changigs should be made on
>         either board (usrp board or rfx900 board) ?
>
>          
>
>
>     On the RFX board
>       Move R36 to R34
>       Move R115 to R116
>
>     Put the rfx board on the USRP and run
>
>       burn-db-eeprom -t rfx900_mimo_a -f -A -B
>
>     Matt
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>     address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>     http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
>
>
> --
> Newell