discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - April 23rd 2010


From: Douglas Geiger
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - April 23rd 2010
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:13:13 -0400

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Josh Blum <address@hidden> wrote:
> XCVR2450 and RFX series boards are now supported in the UHD.
>
> Here is the link to the wiki and manual that I have been working on:
> http://ettus-apps.sourcerepo.com/redmine/ettus/projects/uhd/wiki
>
> The microblaze firmware has changed since the previous announcement.
> Download the most recent builds here:
> http://ettus-apps.sourcerepo.com/redmine/ettus/projects/uhd/files
>
> Feedback and testing is appreciated!
>
> Thank you,
> -Josh
>

Josh,
 Trying it out on one of my USRP2's here, with an RFX2400. The build
went well: libuhd, firmware and fpga images all built fine. And
building the gr-uhd branch of gnuradio had no problems either,
although I haven't gotten to the point of being able to use it yet:  I
seem to be having trouble with the USRP2 registering as being found.
For example, if I run uhd_find_devices, I get:

> $ uhd_find_devices
> No UHD Devices Found

Opening up wireshark, I can see that the host and USRP2 are
communicating over UDP (with the correct IP addresses, it seems to me
at least):

> 43    14:56:36.672264    192.168.10.1    192.168.10.255    UDP    Source 
> port: 40243  Destination port: 49152
> 44    14:56:36.672336    192.168.10.2    192.168.10.1    UDP    Source port: 
> 49152  Destination port: 40243

Host has the IP address 192.168.10.1 on the interface connected to the
USRP2, and the USRP2 appears to have the default 192.168.10.2. I can
send the contents of the UDP packets if you'd like to see them.
Taking a quick look at the usrp2::find function, it looks like it's
supposed to be waiting in a while loop until a timeout occurs, is it
possible the timeout is happening before the response came from the
USRP2? Or have I perhaps made some simple mistake?
 Thanks,
  Doug

-- 
Doug Geiger
address@hidden




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]