Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] complex vector output of a block

[Sammour]

Well, I think I used io_signature correctly. And, as I am using
gr_sync_block, I dont need to worry about forecast, set_output_multiple or
gr_sync_decimator. (I hope this understanding is correct?!)

I have read the " how to write a block" and followed what's in there, but if
you guide me to better documentation, I will be very grateful.

Cheers,
Sam

Eric Blossom wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 03:40:21PM -0700, Sammour wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks for everyone, I sorted the problem out. I needed to increment
>> "out"
>> after memcpy and then return noutput_items/(N*N).
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Sam
> 
> OK.  Glad you (think) you solved your problem.
> 
> Given that your block was asked to compute noutput_items, why are you
> only computing (and/or returning) noutput_items/(N*N) items?
> Doing it this way is increasing the runtime overhead by something on
> the order of N*N.
> 
> This smells like there's something that you don't understand about
> io_signatures, forecast, work, set_output_multiple and/or
> gr_sync_decimator...
> 
> Eric
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/complex-vector-output-of-a-block-tp28828557p28869890.html
Sent from the GnuRadio mailing list archive at Nabble.com.