discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] More sensitivity tests of the USRP2 + Basic_RX


From: Patrick Yeon
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] More sensitivity tests of the USRP2 + Basic_RX
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:26:50 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4

On 10/7/2010 2:38 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
Test setup:

   o A signal generator producing -46dBm at 38.1MHz
   o USRP2 + Basic_RX

   o GRC flowgraph:
       o An FFT filter, reducing the incoming 250KHz bandwidth to 5KHz
       o A power detector:

            (I**2 + Q**2)--->single-pole-iir-filter

       o A strip-chart scope display

Using the scope display, I measured the detector output difference
between nothing connected (which on the BASIC_RX means that
   the A/D is "seeing" the 50-ohm termination across the input-half of
the balun transformer), and my -46dBm signal connected.

That difference amounted to a 65dB difference in detected output power.
Doing the math, does that mean that a "naked"
   USRP2 + Basic_RX is sensitive down to roughly -111dBm, or should I
factor in root(5KHz), which brings it up to -92dBm.

I would spec that configuration as being sensitive down to -111dBm, as that is the input signal power that is equivalent to the noise power you're seeing (you can spot signals so long as they're slightly higher than -111dBm). Of course, as you do some processing, or change filter settings, this will change. It also doesn't mean that you could demod a signal at -111dBm (you still need some margin of SNR), and if you were speccing for a customer, you might bump that up a bit to give yourself some 'wiggle room.'

That's at least how I see it. Anybody else care to weigh in?

--
Patrick Yeon
ThinkRF
613-369-5104 x418



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]