[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The 'next' branch
From: |
Josh Blum |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The 'next' branch |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Feb 2011 20:39:22 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 02/21/2011 07:50 PM, Don Ward wrote:
> Tom Rondeau wrote:
>
>> I would ask all of you who can to start either using or at least
>> testing out the 'next' branch now and provide us with feedback and bug
>> reports.
>
> Compilation on Cygwin fails because there is no <complex.h> (#included
> by volk_complex.h) in Cygwin. In fact, there appears to be no support
> in the Cygwin C library for complex types
> (http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-api/std-notimpl.html). (Complex numbers
> are supported in Cygwin's g++, however.)
>
> Unless there is some reasonable way to avoid requiring complex.h (or to
> avoid building volk), we will need to abandon GNU Radio under Cygwin.
> (That wouldn't bother me too much, as long as it works under
> MinGW---especially if support could be provided building with MSVC.)
>
Totally working on that last part. :-)
-josh
> -- Don W.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio