On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 21:38, Marcus D. Leech
<address@hidden> wrote:
I'll make the observation that there's just got to be a better buffer allocation policy than the existing one. Should it *really* take
Gigabytes of VM, and hundreds of MB of RSS to execute the flow-graph I've attached? The largest inter-block objects--the vectors
in front of and behind the FFT, are on the order of a few MB, and even accounting for some ballooning factor so you can have
several such vectors "in flight", that doesn't add up to hundreds of MB of RSS, and several GB of Virtual Size.