discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] How can Receiver separate between two different f


From: niaz ahmed
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] How can Receiver separate between two different frequency's input
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 09:58:06 +0500

Thanks Marcus,
 I appreciate your approach and i guess i will need goertzel transform over these frequencies.

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Marcus D. Leech <address@hidden> wrote:

I am working on an application where i receive input at audio_sink and check for tone or data.
Data is FSK modulated at 1k and 3k whereas Tone is of 2k (i.e Tone lies in the middle).

I have written a flow graph which consists of two heirarichal flow graphs (tone_rx and data_rx).
Input is received at audio_sink and then forwarded to both sub-graphs.

My code works fine when tone is received but there is a problem when Data is received.
Because Data consists of FSK code and it has 2k components in it which also triggers Tone graph.

So i want to ask is there any GnuRadio Block by using which i can avoid triggering of tone while receiving Data
as i need to eliminate 2k component for Data but retain it when input it is  Tone. OR
is there any such method by which we identify at the start whether it is data or tone.
i am using laptop sound card (not usrp).

Simple first approximation.  Use the short-term-average power calculated over the data channels (1KHz and 3KHz), to drive a squelch
 function on the 2KHz channel.  I'll leave the details up to you, but I'd basically have some logic that said "if energy at 1KHz and energy at 3KHz,
 squelch the 2KHz tone channel."




--
Marcus Leech
Principal Investigator
Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium
http://www.sbrac.org



_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio



--
Niaz Ahmed



“We are always more anxious to be distinguished for a talent which we do not possess, than to be praised for the fifteen which we do possess”    :  Mark Twain





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]