[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc
From: |
Rafael Diniz |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:21:18 -0800 |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.21 |
I really think that projects like the ones in CGRAN have great value.
The key point in my option is to implement some widely used standards
_using_ the gnuradio framework.
As examples I'd say TV broadcast standards like DVB, ISDB-Tb, radio
standards like DAB, DRM, ..., this will greatly improve Gnuradio adoption
and use, by universities, hobbists and companies.
I don't think money is the only issue involved, but of course it would help.
An university involvement approach like the VT one is also very interesting.
Best regards,
Rafael Diniz
>
> Without a monetization strategy I don't see how the gnu radio project gets
> much past its current state. The problem is the functionality of a
> prototyper or student is implemented in about 20% of the effort for a full
> application. The documentation, testing, deployment, and maintenance of a
> real application needs a lot more work and that work is not educational or
> enjoyable. So without something like an app store where developers can get
> reimbursed for that other 80% the applications will stay stuck at the cool
> demo stage.
- [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc, Martin Braun, 2012/02/14
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc, Martin Braun, 2012/02/15
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc, Jeff Brower, 2012/02/15
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc, Ed Criscuolo, 2012/02/15
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc, Jeff Brower, 2012/02/15