discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [PyBOMBS] pre-2.1.0 release testing on CentOS 7


From: Richard Bell
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [PyBOMBS] pre-2.1.0 release testing on CentOS 7
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 11:08:54 -0700

Hi Martin,

Yes I did source the setup_env.sh file. I can call gnuradio-companion from command line and the base install works fine. It's only when compiling OOT modules that I have issues.

 I have not tried compiling without sudo, I will give it a shot.

Rich

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Martin Braun <address@hidden> wrote:
Richard,

did you call your setup_env.sh before doing the compile? Also, you can
run cmake with -Wno-dev to remove some more annoying warnings.

On 06/04/2016 04:40 PM, Richard Bell wrote:
> Sure no problem. Here is the output when I try to build a brand new or
> pre-existing OOT module, notice the cmake warnings:
>
> address@hidden:~/Documents/pcodes/radio_devel/custom_grblocks/gr-add_tagged_stream_once/build$
> cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/home/rbell/Documents/grprefix/ ..
> -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 5.3.1
> [...]
> -- Configuring done
> -- Generating done
> -- Build files have been written to:
> /home/rbell/Documents/pcodes/radio_devel/custom_grblocks/gr-add_tagged_stream_once/build

Looks like this worked fine.

> address@hidden:~/Documents/pcodes/radio_devel/custom_grblocks/gr-add_tagged_stream_once/build$
> sudo make install

You really don't want to 'sudo make' anything unless you really need to.
Here, you don't, as far as I can tell.

Martin

> Scanning dependencies of target gnuradio-add_tagged_stream_once
> [  4%] Building CXX object
> lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-add_tagged_stream_once.dir/add_tagged_stream_once_impl.cc.o
> [  8%] Linking CXX shared library libgnuradio-add_tagged_stream_once.so
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgnuradio-runtime
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgnuradio-pmt
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-add_tagged_stream_once.dir/build.make:98: recipe
> for target 'lib/libgnuradio-add_tagged_stream_once.so' failed
> make[2]: *** [lib/libgnuradio-add_tagged_stream_once.so] Error 1
> CMakeFiles/Makefile2:137: recipe for target
> 'lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-add_tagged_stream_once.dir/all' failed
> make[1]: *** [lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-add_tagged_stream_once.dir/all]
> Error 2
> Makefile:138: recipe for target 'all' failed
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Marcus Müller <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Rich,
>
>     currently unable to access my Ubuntu VMs; could you copy&paste the
>     build log of your OOT? Also, I might be a bit paranoid, but could
>     you verify by "which gr_modtool" that you're really running the
>     modtool you want?
>
>     Best regards,
>     Marcus
>
>
>     On 04.06.2016 17:51, Richard Bell wrote:
>>     Since I didn't get much feedback when I brought this up a few
>>     weeks ago, I want to bring it up again to make sure you all see
>>     it.  After using the default pybombs command to build a clean
>>     install on Ubuntu 16.04, everything worked fine except that I
>>     can't get gr_modtool working. No OOT Modules I make, old or brand
>>     new, will make it through compile. There are cmake issues I've
>>     never seen before.
>>
>>     Can someone confirm they have used gr_modtool on Ubuntu 16.04
>>     successfully after installing via the pybombs default route.
>>
>>     Sent from my iPad
>>
>>     On Jun 3, 2016, at 7:42 PM, Eric Statzer
>>     <<mailto:address@hidden>address@hidden
>>     <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:19 AM Marcus Müller
>>>     <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>         Everyone should get a kick out of this: I had fixed this
>>>>         once before [1] but it was actually YOU, Marcus, that broke
>>>>         it again! [2]
>>>         I wish that was true! First of all, we need to find a better
>>>         way to fix that then to build libtool on practically all
>>>         platforms from source.
>>>         You really don't need libtool > 2.4.6 to build thrift. Works
>>>         perfectly on my Fedora 22 with libtool 2.4.2 .
>>>         The problem is not the libtool version, by the way.
>>>         autoconf/aclocal just can't, for some reasons I really can't
>>>         figure out, find the "default" system-wide M4 files
>>>         containing the PKG_CHECK_MODULES macro under specific
>>>         circumstances. It seems that installing libtool into the same
>>>         prefix one is going to use later on fixes the problem (as the
>>>         M4s end up in a location that aclocal ends up looking in).
>>>         Have a test: if you edit the bootstrap.sh of thrift, and
>>>         modify the
>>>
>>>         aclocal -I ./aclocal
>>>
>>>         line to
>>>
>>>         aclocal -I $(env -i aclocal --print-ac-dir) -I ./aclocal
>>>
>>>         the M4 syntax error disappears, at least for me. Of course,
>>>         thrift wouldn't successfully build with those modifications,
>>>         either, but that's really a long rabbit hole to go into :)
>>>         Hence my curiosity!
>>>
>>>
>>>     Alright, its all coming back to me now, I think you've got me
>>>     straightened out again, Marcus.  I was definitely wrong on the
>>>     pkg-config/libtool versions before, thanks for taking my hasty
>>>     accusations so well!  This is the exact same sort of issue that I
>>>     was running in to when running autoreconf for libosmo-dsp and I
>>>     realized that having ANY version of pkg-config installed from
>>>     source under the PYBOMBS_PREFIX would make these sort of errors
>>>     go away, too.  I'm on-board with leaving the pkg-config and
>>>     libtool versions alone and fixing the real underlying problems.
>>>
>>>     So, the thrift recipe was switched to using git for the source
>>>     fetch around this time [3] due to a possible thrift bug.
>>>     Question: now that thrift 0.9.3 is available in tarball form,
>>>     might we want to switch back to using the release tarball?  The
>>>     benefit of the tarball is that it already includes all of the
>>>     required m4 macro files, and that makes ./configure run MUCH more
>>>     smoothly.  In fact, this branch [4], which just switches to the
>>>     tarball release of thrift 0.9.3, builds cleanly for me on CentOS
>>>     7.  Give it a shot!
>>>
>>>     -Eric
>>>
>>>     [3] https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/commit/621c086b94e1f9b70f24034bf6fb6f7e15e5fa7c
>>>     [4] https://github.com/estatz/gr-recipes/tree/thrift_tarball
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>>     address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>>>     https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>


_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]