discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Adding OOT module to CGRAN


From: Chris Kuethe
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Adding OOT module to CGRAN
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:13:00 -0700

Thanks - I already added a recipe.

I'm don't think the satisfy section is correct, as there are no
resullts returned by "apt search polaris" or "port search polaris" on
my machines.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Smith, Brandon <address@hidden> wrote:
> I have the recipe file ready and it's published at: 
> https://github.com/drs-ss/drs-gr-recipes
>
> -Brandon Smith
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Kuethe [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:59 PM
> To: Smith, Brandon <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Adding OOT module to CGRAN
>
> Thanks for the heads up. I'll add this to PyBOMBS.
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Smith, Brandon <address@hidden> wrote:
>> We have just published our first OOT module to Github (
>> https://github.com/drs-ss/gr-polaris )and would like to get the module
>> published on CGRAN. The instructions I found point me to the
>> gnuradio-legacy recipes repo. I am guessing we shouldn’t be submitting
>> pulls requests to the legacy repo. So should we submit to the gr-recipes or 
>> gr-etcetera?
>>
>>
>>
>> Also, is there a way we can be indexed for CGRAN without submitting
>> pull requests to gr-recipes or gr-etcetera?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> - Brandon Smith
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>
>
>
> --
> GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
>



-- 
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]