[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] HackRF + osmocon, RX works but TX doesnt
From: |
Cinaed Simson |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] HackRF + osmocon, RX works but TX doesnt |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:57:09 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 |
You should post your HackRF questions to the HackRF mailing list
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
Also, you should get to know your HackRF so you don't blow the RF amplifiers
http://www.greatscottgadgets.com/sdr
In addition, you should at least ensure the installed HackRF libraries
and the firmware on the HackRF match - ideally they should be latest
version - which is rarely true is they are installed by the OS.
https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/releases
-- Cinaed
On 02/28/2017 01:35 AM, Fernando Peral wrote:
> I have tried with the one in the repositories of ubuntu 16.04 (I think
> the package is called gr-osmosdr) and with the live DVD of pentoo,
> both fail the same way when using hackrf=0 both work using serial number.
>
> regards
>
> El 28/02/17 a las 07:51, Sagnik Basu escribió:
>> Maybe there is some error with your osmocom source installation. I am
>> using a HackRF one and it is working fine with osmocom sink block. Try
>> re-installing the osmocom source.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sagnik Basu
>> B. Tech | 2013-2017
>> Dept. of Electronics and Communication
>> NIT Rourkela
>> M: 8337942928
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Fernando Peral
>> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>>
>> The problem appears when using the hackrf for TX even if there is
>> only one hackrf plugged.
>> Osmocon source makes the hackrf work with hackrf=0 or even leving
>> the field in blank, but osmocon sink fails with the same parameters.
>> However using the serial number works as much for one as for the
>> other.
>>
>> thanks for the help
>>
>>
>> El 27/02/17 a las 19:38, Chris Kuethe escribió:
>>> try using the hackrf's serial number (d291f43, 5671743) rather
>>> than the index (0, 1)
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Fernando Peral
>>> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>
>>> I have a HackRF. I'm testing it.
>>>
>>> It works well receiving in GRC with osmocon source, but when
>>> trying to transmit with osmocon sink I receive an error
>>>
>>> FATAL: Failed to open HackRF device (-5) HACKRF_ERROR_NOT_FOUND
>>>
>>>
>>> It is like if it were a problem of permissions, but it is
>>> not, the HackRF is working great receiving.
>>>
>>>
>>> I Have tried with two HackRF, one transmiting one receeiving,
>>> this it the block diagram
>>>
>>> I have updated the firmware of both of them to the last one
>>> (2017-02)
>>>
>>>
>>> this is the error output
>>>
>>> Using Volk machine: sse4_a_64_orc
>>>
>>> gr-osmosdr 0.1.4 (0.1.4) gnuradio 3.7.9
>>>
>>> built-in source types: file osmosdr fcd rtl rtl_tcp uhd miri
>>> hackrf bladerf rfspace airspy redpitaya
>>>
>>> Using HackRF One with firmware 2017.02.1
>>>
>>> gr-osmosdr 0.1.4 (0.1.4) gnuradio 3.7.9
>>>
>>> built-in sink types: uhd hackrf bladerf redpitaya file
>>>
>>> Number of USB devices: 19
>>>
>>> USB device 1d50:6089: 000000000000000071c469c82d291f43 skip
>>>
>>> USB device 1d50:6089: 000000000000000071c469c825671743 skip
>>>
>>>
>>> FATAL: Failed to open HackRF device (-5) HACKRF_ERROR_NOT_FOUND
>>>
>>>
>>> Trying to fill up 1 missing channel(s) with null sink(s).
>>>
>>> This is being done to prevent the application from crashing
>>>
>>> due to gnuradio bug #528.
>>>
>>>
>>> The first one is receiving (numer 1), the second (number 0)
>>> is the one wich fails
>>>
>>>
>>> Using ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
>>>
>>>
>>> Any clues?
>>>
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>> address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>> <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>> <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>