[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: explaining i/q
From: |
David Hagood |
Subject: |
Re: explaining i/q |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Nov 2020 19:13:09 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.2 |
On 11/4/20 6:26 PM, david vanhorn wrote:
"Twice the bandwidth" but that doesn't account for the 0 Hz "hole"
where the incoming signal is exactly at the sampling rate.
Or am I missing something?
What "hole" are you referring to? There is the "zero bang", which occurs
because most systems aren't perfect and have a DC component to the LOs
and mixing system, but a "perfect" system with zero DC in the LOs will
resolve a DC signal. The imperfection of the implementation doesn't mean
the concept is imperfect.
OpenPGP_0x5B9DC79986207D69.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: explaining i/q, (continued)
- Re: explaining i/q, gilles rubin, 2020/11/03
- Re: explaining i/q, Jeff Long, 2020/11/03
- Re: explaining i/q, Kristoff, 2020/11/03
- Re: explaining i/q, David Hagood, 2020/11/03
- Re: explaining i/q, Kristoff, 2020/11/03
- Re: explaining i/q, David Hagood, 2020/11/03
- Re: explaining i/q, Kristoff, 2020/11/04
- Re: explaining i/q, David Hagood, 2020/11/04
- Re: explaining i/q, Fons Adriaensen, 2020/11/04
- Re: explaining i/q, david vanhorn, 2020/11/04
- Re: explaining i/q,
David Hagood <=
- Re: explaining i/q, Fons Adriaensen, 2020/11/05
- Re: explaining i/q, Jeff Long, 2020/11/03
- Re: explaining i/q, Kristoff, 2020/11/04
- Re: explaining i/q, Christophe Seguinot, 2020/11/04
- Re: explaining i/q, Don Wade, 2020/11/04
- Re: explaining i/q, Kristoff, 2020/11/04
- Re: explaining i/q, david vanhorn, 2020/11/04
- Re: explaining i/q, Fons Adriaensen, 2020/11/04
- Re: explaining i/q, Anon Lister, 2020/11/04
- Re: explaining i/q, Anon Lister, 2020/11/04