[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Qt widgets Improvement
From: |
Marcus D. Leech |
Subject: |
Re: Qt widgets Improvement |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jan 2023 14:30:17 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 |
On 29/01/2023 14:20, Rohit Bisht wrote:
I'd like to start with "integrating gnu with qt creator" because it
would make it easier to write code in the integrated qt environment
and speed up build, run, and testing. I believe adjusting the cmake
file and fixing paths to missing library files would be the way to go
(though I'll require more directions on that).
Then "adding new widgets" followed by "improving them" .
I guess it depends on what you think the dominant design doctrine should
be "gorgeous UI with the DSP as a kind of afterthought",
or "robust DSP with the UI as a kind of afterthought". I don't
think that Qt designer is a particularly productive way to design
the DSP bits of a DSP application.
The whole "form is more important than function" is a bit of leftover
brain-death promulgated by Steve Jobs, and it was as
wrong-headed then as it is now, IMHO.
- Qt widgets Improvement, Rohit Bisht, 2023/01/29
- Re: Qt widgets Improvement,
Marcus D. Leech <=
- RE: Re: Qt widgets Improvement, Jim Melton, 2023/01/30
- Re: Qt widgets Improvement, Marcus Müller, 2023/01/30
- Re: Qt widgets Improvement, Volker Schroer, 2023/01/30
- Re: Qt widgets Improvement, Marcus Müller, 2023/01/30
- Re: Qt widgets Improvement, Volker Schroer, 2023/01/31
- Re: Qt widgets Improvement, Jeff Long, 2023/01/31
Re: Qt widgets Improvement, Marcus Müller, 2023/01/30