[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: switch to XHTML
From: |
Pete French |
Subject: |
Re: switch to XHTML |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Mar 2002 10:59:59 +0000 |
> issues that existed in SGML (which HTML is defined in). SGML is so
> complex that no one would write a browser with an SGML parser, it would
Isnt this what OmniWeb does ? Thats certainly what it claims to be doing
in the prigress bar. Maybe that why its so hideouslyslow. Even running
OpenStepon a1.2GHz Athlon doesnt make it acceptably fast!
-bat.
- Re: switch to XHTML, Gregory Martin Pfeil, 2002/03/02
- Re: switch to XHTML, Jeff Teunissen, 2002/03/05
- Re: switch to XHTML, Gregory Martin Pfeil, 2002/03/08
- Re: switch to XHTML,
Pete French <=
- Re: switch to XHTML, Jeff Teunissen, 2002/03/08
- Re: switch to XHTML, Robert J. Slover, 2002/03/08
- Re: switch to XHTML, Pete French, 2002/03/08
- Re: switch to XHTML, Pascal Bourguignon, 2002/03/08
- Re: switch to XHTML, Jeff Teunissen, 2002/03/08
- Re: switch to XHTML, Jeff Teunissen, 2002/03/08
- Re: switch to XHTML, Pete French, 2002/03/09
- Re: switch to XHTML, Jeff Teunissen, 2002/03/11