[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: frameworks Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH.
From: |
Björn Gohla |
Subject: |
Re: frameworks Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH. |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Mar 2002 18:45:01 +0100 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 04 March 2002 23:13, Mirko Viviani wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Mar 2002, Helge Hess wrote:
> > We always tried to map frameworks to shared libraries. Actually this
> > might be the wrong approach, we should consider loading frameworks as a
> > bundle
>
> I already though about this in the past but it is not a good move.
> Libraries has some problems and bundles have others.
>
> > since this also gives us -bundleForClass: etc !
>
> -bundleForClass: is working with framework. At least it was in the past, I
> don't know now.
could anyone for the sake of clarity describe what exactly the differences
are between bundles, frameworks and libraries? i only have a rough idea.
- --
/* Nobody will ever see this message :-) */
panic("Cannot initialize video hardware\n");
2.0.38 /usr/src/linux/arch/m68k/atari/atafb.c
pub 1024D/834F4976 2001-01-07 Björn Gohla (Wissenschaftler, Weltbürger)
<b.gohla@gmx.de>
Key fingerprint = 9FF4 FEDA CCDF DA0E 14D5 8129 6C14 3C39 834F 4976
sub 1024g/29571FE2 2001-01-07
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8ikokbBQ8OYNPSXYRAlM5AJ4xIIu5Qw7uRKp8EJvVBxFjp1e9cgCfeQRY
3vxTJSBUct5hqR4hBNzgN9o=
=Jwrq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----