[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: open letter about development proposals
From: |
Chris B. Vetter |
Subject: |
Re: open letter about development proposals |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:55:49 -0700 |
No, no C++ flaming this time ... ;-)
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:05:20 +0200
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <Lars.Sonchocky-Helldorf@bbdo-interone.de>
wrote:
> I think Camino ( http://www.mozilla.org/projects/camino/ ) can play
> this role. Camino is a Cocoa wrapper for the Gecko layout Engine
> written in Objective-C/Objective-C++.
> Once those objc improvements for gcc (
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-07/msg02334.html ) are through
> gcc should support objC++ and porting Camino to GNUstep shouldn't be a
> big issue then.
Many consider KHTML/bindings (as used by Apple's Safari, and recently by
Omni) the better implementation. If/when ObjC++ is available via gcc,
porting KHTML to GNUstep would probably be even easier.
Using WebCore (and JavaCore) a browser _completely_ based on GNUstep
could be written within a very short time...
--
Chris
- open letter about development proposals, Riccardo Mottola, 2003/08/01
- Message not available
- Re: open letter about development proposals, stefan, 2003/08/05
- Re: open letter about development proposals, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/08/05
- Re: open letter about development proposals, stefan, 2003/08/05
- Re: open letter about development proposals, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/08/05