[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML idea
From: |
Alexander Malmberg |
Subject: |
Re: XML idea |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Jan 2004 23:26:16 +0100 |
Helge Hess wrote:
> On 06.01.2004, at 21:57, Pete French wrote:
> > I rather meant the other way round - GNUstep needs an implementation of
> > NSXMLParser somehow, does it not?
No, it doesn't.
[snip]
> > As I said, I dont like it, and it
> > has a lot of problems apparently, but in terms of keeping all the bits
> > in GNustep Foundation that are to be found in Cocoa Foundation its
> > necessary :-(
>
> Yes. BTW: this also includes
> NSInputStream / NSOutputStream
> NSError
> etc - which are all less then perfect ;-)
If they aren't good, we shouldn't add them. A good, standalone XML
framework is much better than a bad, minimalistic implementation in
-base.
A standalone framework also solves some dependency problems; having to
depend on -base being configured a certain way isn't nice.
- Alexander Malmberg
- XML idea, Dennis Leeuw, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Pete French, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Marcel Weiher, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Pete French, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea,
Alexander Malmberg <=
- Re: XML idea, Pete French, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Jason Clouse, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, richard, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2004/01/07