[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML idea
From: |
Alex Perez |
Subject: |
Re: XML idea |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:02:06 -0800 (PST) |
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Pete French wrote:
> > I don't think I understand what you mean here. gnustep-base-additions is
> > a semi-separate part of gnustep-base that can be compiled as a library
> > on top of Cocoa. It contains _GNUstep_ extensions, and is meant make it
>
> So what we also need is the reverse - a library of bits which exist in Cocoa
> but not GNustep which can be compiled on top of GNUstep. Which is wat I
> think the portability library is addressing isnt it ?
...this is what PortabilityKit *IS*.
>
> -bat.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>
- Re: XML idea, (continued)
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Alexander Malmberg, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Marcel Weiher, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Alexander Malmberg, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Pete French, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea,
Alex Perez <=
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Adam Fedor, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Jason Clouse, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Jason Clouse, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Adam Fedor, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Jason Clouse, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Adam Fedor, 2004/01/08
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/07