Re: XML idea

[Richard Frith-Macdonald]

On 8 Jan 2004, at 23:12, Alex Perez wrote:

> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Adam Fedor wrote:
> > > Putting the source code in a subdirectory, and extending the
> > > automatically generated documentation to mark such stuff as
> > > MacOS-X compatibility code would be quite enough to make
> > > me very happy,
> > I like that idea as well.
> However, this does not address the issue of what to do with crap 
> classes
> which were poorly designed on Apple's part...Would those be included?
> excluded? See the problem? This doesnt fix the problem. It makes it 
> more
> complicated.

I was proposing it precisely *for* the crap classes.
If the classes are not crap/bloat, I want them in the same location as 
all the
existing code, rather than in a subdirectory.

Of course, it may not be immediately obvious whether something is 
crap/bloat
or not ... but the obvious solution to that is to put new contributions 
in a
subdirectory first, and move them to the main directory if/when there is
a consensus to do so (actually, I'd personally be quite happy to have 
Adam
decide, but a consensus is better for people in general).