Re: [GSWHackers] Re: OGo/GNUstep cooperation Re: Re[2]: Frameworks

[Marco Scheurer]

On Mar 11, 2004, at 6:03 PM, S.J.Chun wrote:

> Nit because I do think assigning copyright to FSF is important, but I 
> am really curious on
> that subject, I've asked :-) In this discussion, some people ask to do 
> it, and Helge did not
> make it clear(as far as I can see), and my personal curiosity makes me 
> ask it. So please
> calm down.

I'm not upset so I don't need to calm down (are you?), I'm just 
wondering why so many on this list seem to think it is of paramount 
important that everything that touches GNUstep should be (c) FSF.

Your email which said "though I prefer first method be possible" and "I 
think SOPE to FSF will solve most problems during this discussion. (I'm 
afraid that this is rather impossible" did not make it crystal clear 
that the problem was not important to you.  Also, I think that Helge 
already made it clear that he does want to give away the copyright from 
SOPE, so asking once more did not look like genuine curiosity to me but 
more like another request to do it, but I could be wrong.

If I misunderstood your email, sorry, but good: that makes at least 2 
of us who think that this should not be an issue.

In any case, that was not an attack on you or your views of the subject.

marco