[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: building gnustep-base-1.8.0 on Max OS X 10.3.2
From: |
Andrew Pinski |
Subject: |
Re: building gnustep-base-1.8.0 on Max OS X 10.3.2 |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:07:52 -0800 |
On Mar 17, 2004, at 14:25, Bill Northcott wrote:
On 17/03/2004, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
The reason why __builtin_return/__builtin_apply_args were broken so
long were because
they were added just for GNU's libobjc and really no one should be
using them. I hope
to remove the usage of these builtins in a future libobjc so they can
be removed from
GCC the next release after the one which uses libffi.
So where can I get up to date and reasonably portable libffi code
which will work on Darwin/MacOS X? The last official release is 1.2.
This is an easy one, you can use the one from GCC itself.
The one included in GCC is almost the official one now. I mean almost
as there is a
movement to get it copyrighted by the FSF so it can be official part of
GCC.
In fact gcj in GCC uses libffi just fine and there is a nice testsuite
in GCC's version
of libffi for it.
Most of the current work done for libffi is being done by Andreas
Tobler who also did
the port to PPC darwin.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
- Re: building gnustep-base-1.8.0 on Max OS X 10.3.2, Dennis Leeuw, 2004/03/10
- Re: building gnustep-base-1.8.0 on Max OS X 10.3.2, Adam Fedor, 2004/03/17
- Re: building gnustep-base-1.8.0 on Max OS X 10.3.2, Nicola Pero, 2004/03/17
- Re: building gnustep-base-1.8.0 on Max OS X 10.3.2, Riccardo Mottola, 2004/03/19
- Re: building gnustep-base-1.8.0 on Max OS X 10.3.2, Andrew Pinski, 2004/03/20
- gcc builtins mframe etc., Bill Northcott, 2004/03/17