[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Q] shared version of libobjc
From: |
Kazunobu Kuriyama |
Subject: |
Re: [Q] shared version of libobjc |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:25:53 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ja-JP; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 |
Nicola Pero wrote:
As the manual or other documents say nothing about if, I'm wondering
if I can
rely on it.
Does anyone knows something about it?
libobjc.so built by GCC has been working very well for years now.
Thanks
Great. Then I guess there should be a Makefile macro in -make which
forces the linker to use a static libobjc when that macro is specified
(in particular, for such systems that allow us to install both static
and shared libraries). Is there such a macro? Or should I hack other
macros such as LDFLAGS, say LDFLAGS='-static -lobjc', to control the
linker when static linking is needed?
Thanks.
Kazunobu Kuriyama