[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about ObjC++ state
From: |
Mike Stump |
Subject: |
Re: Question about ObjC++ state |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 18:52:38 -0800 |
On Feb 28, 2005, at 3:41 AM, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
I'd like to know what the 'official' position regarding ObjC++ is now.
Anybody willing to clear up?
Sure, why not... Either, someone will submit a clean, safe patch and
it will be reviewed and OKed and it will be checked in, or that's won't
happen. I've added a pool to the wiki pages where you can register
your vote. If no patch is submitted, there is little point in
considering/contemplating/arguing what would happen. If such a patch
were submitted, it would have to go into mainline first anyway, if it
proves safe there and people want to propose a version of it for 4.0.x,
then I think the RM would have to reevaluate it on its merits and risks
and the timing. I don't see the need for the RM to declare at this
point what a future decision would be. I suspect that if done well,
the RM would entertain allowing it in 4.0.[n+1]; but that is just
speculation.
P.S.: cc'ed to the GNUstep list just for informational purpose
[ assuming that list is still closed, since, you didn't say they opened
it ] Will you please stop doing that... It drives us nuts, absolutely
nuts. If it is now an open list, never mind...
- Re: Question about ObjC++ state,
Mike Stump <=