[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Log messages (or lack thereof) in SVN
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: Log messages (or lack thereof) in SVN |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:02:37 +0100 (BST) |
> > P.S.
> > And just for the record (I'll not name any names; I'd imagine you know
> > who you are), the primary violator of the "no blank commit messages"
> > suggestion has used a commit message on 4 of his last 100 commits (2 of
> > which were made today). The diff for these same 100 commits comes to a
> > staggering:
> >
> > 384 files changed, 59082 insertions(+), 9840 deletions(-)
> >
> > I pray that nobody ever must decipher what has changed over the last
> > several months.
>
> Well, these commits are only in the gworkspace repository; I was
> thinking that there are not many people interested in what has changed
> in each commit because I'm the only person that works at this project...
Eheh ... I know what you mean ;-)
... but it looks like there are actually people following what you do! ...
:-)
Have you tried writing a very short and quick sentence every time you make
a change, like "Fixed crash in file search" or "Implemented monitoring
file changes" or something like that ? It takes a few seconds to write it
(I personally use 'svn commit -m "Fixed crash in file search"', it works
like a charm without even opening an external editor) ;-)
If you reflect on the fact that there are people actually reading the
messages (else they wouldn't be complaining!), you might feel it's quite
nice to write them ;-)
Let's face it, you're popular ... you're a celebrity, people are watching
you and avidly reading your subversion commit messages! :-)
(actually, I'm not joking, they seem to be really reading them!)
Anyway, if you get the habit of writing a short Subversion message with
each commit, you'll find is not much in terms of burocracy overhead, and
it's quite nice.
Thanks Enrico