[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cocotron
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Cocotron |
Date: |
29 Dec 2006 00:31:28 -0800 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb:
> I actually have no problem at all with the idea of renaming ... in
> fact, for compatibility it might be nice if we could build them so
> that they could be used both as libraries and frameworks at the same
> time, so that cocoa developers could link to them the same way they
> do on macos. I don't know how to modify makefiles etc to build them
> that way, but it can't really be all that hard.
That is basically the way the mySTEP makefile works.
It builds e.g. the AppKit.framework hierarchy (Version/Current etc.
incl. all links) through Xcode (but tht can also be done in a Makefile
and adds a special Version/Linux-ARM which contains
a) a libAppKit.so
b) a symbolic link AppKit -> libAppKit.so
The compiler's CFLAGS gets passed as -L all
Frameworks/*.framework/Versions/Current/Linux-ARM so that it finds
-lAppKit as libAppKit.so
Apple has added special code to gcc to search frameworks in all -F
framework paths. I have not yet found a reasonable way to easily
emulate this -F flag.
-- hns
- Re: Cocotron, (continued)
- Re: Cocotron, Gregory John Casamento, 2006/12/28
- Re: Cocotron, Yen-Ju Chen, 2006/12/28
- Re: Cocotron, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2006/12/28
- Re: Cocotron, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2006/12/29
- Message not available
- Re: Cocotron,
address@hidden <=
Re: Cocotron, Gregory John Casamento, 2006/12/28
Re: Cocotron, Gregory John Casamento, 2006/12/28
Re: Cocotron, Gregory John Casamento, 2006/12/28
Re: Cocotron, Gregory John Casamento, 2006/12/29
Re: Cocotron, address@hidden, 2006/12/29
Re: Cocotron, Gregory John Casamento, 2006/12/30