[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NSImageCompressionFactor
From: |
Fred Kiefer |
Subject: |
Re: NSImageCompressionFactor |
Date: |
Fri, 30 May 2014 14:18:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 |
On 29.05.2014 00:29, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Fred Kiefer wrote:
>> On 21.05.2014 16:56, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
>> thank you for looking into this and fixing it! Just to make sure,
>> could you please check your results on a Mac as well? I find the words
>> used in the Apple documentation rather confusing: "JPEG compression
>> allows a compression factor ranging from 0.0 to 1.0, with 0.0 being
>> the lowest and 1.0 being the highest." From this I would expect 0 to
>> be no compression, that is a huge file and 1 being a high compression,
>> that is a smaller file.
> It is confusing... It depends if "factor" means rate or quality.
> Anyway, now PRICE behaves the same on GNUstep and on Mac, making files
> smaller and coarser.
> The quality is not directly similar, but that I suppose depends on the
> library and other parameters, the quality is only qualitative.
Thank you for checking this on the Mac.
Fred
- Re: NSImageCompressionFactor, (continued)
- Re: NSImageCompressionFactor, Fred Kiefer, 2014/05/15
- Re: NSImageCompressionFactor, Lundberg, Johannes, 2014/05/15
- Re: NSImageCompressionFactor, Riccardo Mottola, 2014/05/16
- Re: NSImageCompressionFactor, Lundberg, Johannes, 2014/05/19
- Re: NSImageCompressionFactor, Lundberg, Johannes, 2014/05/19
- Re: NSImageCompressionFactor, Riccardo Mottola, 2014/05/20
- Re: NSImageCompressionFactor, Riccardo Mottola, 2014/05/21
- Re: NSImageCompressionFactor, Lundberg, Johannes, 2014/05/21
- Re: NSImageCompressionFactor, Fred Kiefer, 2014/05/27
- Re: NSImageCompressionFactor, Riccardo Mottola, 2014/05/28
- Re: NSImageCompressionFactor,
Fred Kiefer <=