discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4)


From: Bertrand Dekoninck
Subject: Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4)
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 21:42:24 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux ppc64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.5.0

Le 07/03/2016 21:05, Richard Faith-Macdonald a écrit :

On 7 Mar 2016, at 17:45, Bertrand Dekoninck <bertrand.dekoninck@gmail.com> 
wrote:



Here's mine, on debian wheezy, ppc (64 bit kernel).

Testing test02.m...
Running base/NSNumber/test02.m...
Start set:       test02.m:12 ... NSDecimalNumber
Failed test:       test02.m:31 ... rounding 0.009
Expected '0.01' and got '0.0'
Failed test:       test02.m:37 ... rounding 0.019
Expected '0.02' and got '0.0'
Failed test:       test02.m:51 ... rounding 0.0009
Expected '0.001' and got '0.0'
Failed test:       test02.m:57 ... rounding 0.0019
Expected '0.002' and got '0.0'
End set:         test02.m:59 ... NSDecimalNumber
Completed file:  test02.m



Not a lot more info. What other part of this 8mb file should I give ?


I think that's it ... tells us the rounded value in each case was zero.

I wonder if the fact that it's 64bit ppc indicates a byte ordering issue 
somewhere?


I really can't help on the bigendian thing. Sorry.

But the userland is 32bit and the compiled files seem to be 32bit.

For instance : typing "file basictypes.m.o" in a terminal gives

basictypes.m.o: ELF 32-bit MSB relocatable, PowerPC or cisco 4500, version 1 (SYSV), with unknown capability 0x41000000 = 0xf676e75, with unknown capability 0x10000 = 0x70401, not stripped.

Bertrand



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]