discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: runtime 2.0 issues.


From: David Chisnall
Subject: Re: runtime 2.0 issues.
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:27:10 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0

On 05/03/2019 12:45, Andreas Fink wrote:

Making all for tool cvtenc...
  Linking tool cvtenc ...
./obj/cvtenc.obj/cvtenc.m.o:(.data..objc_init[.objc_init]+0x18): undefined reference to `__start___objc_classes' ./obj/cvtenc.obj/cvtenc.m.o:(.data..objc_init[.objc_init]+0x20): undefined reference to `__stop___objc_classes'

As I have said before, this is a bug in clang 7.x It is fixed in the 8.x release branch and the fix is back-ported in the FreeBSD llvm70 package. If your favourite operating system's LLVM 7 package does not work, please ask them to incorporate this fix:

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/llvm70/files/clang/patch-tools_clang_lib_CodeGen_CGObjCGNU.cpp?revision=489195&view=markup

This bug doesn't affect real code, but it will be a problem for any programs that use Objective-C but don't contain any classes, which unfortunately includes most of the GNUstep base configure scripts.

I have tested clang 8 on FreeBSD and am able to build all of the GNUstep applications that I've tried (all of the ones in the FreeBSD ports collection) with it without issues. This version already contains the bug fix. It does cause a regression in one of the libobjc2 tests, which I'm working on tracking down (it's triggered by a change to how LLVM does ARC optimisation, but that's not actually the cause), but that particular pattern is unlikely to occur in real code.

David



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]