[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [fairuse-discuss] Re: [DMCA-Activists] Re: DC 7/17: Tactic
From: |
root |
Subject: |
Re: [fairuse-discuss] Re: [DMCA-Activists] Re: DC 7/17: Tactic |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:54:31 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.27i |
No
On the 17th we are focusing are driving home the point that we are the stake
holders.
This is a political matter, not an academic one. Our focus is single, clear and
repetitive.
Ruben
> One must question the constitutionality of DRM, in that copyright is allowed
> only for a *LIMITED* time, and an effective DRM technology would extend
> copyright to an *UNLIMITED* time since, once the works enter the public
> domain, they would nevertheless remain unavailable.
>
> I don't know if this is an argument that would bring any value to the 7/17
> meeting, but it is certainly something to keep in mind, and might make a very
> valid lawsuit for an injunction, should something like this ever become
> mandated by law.
>
> ____________________________
> New Yorkers for Fair Use -
> because it's either fair use or useless....