dmca-activists
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[DMCA-Activists] SCO Page Hack


From: Seth Johnson
Subject: [DMCA-Activists] SCO Page Hack
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 02:41:09 -0500

List chatter says this page is a hack on the SCO site by someone
of the alias realloc().  It also shows up on the site-wide
navigation menus, under Company -> Intellectual Property -> Red
Hat v. SCO


Seth


> http://www.sco.com/redhat/


Red Hat v. SCO 

Red Hat, Inc. filed suit against The SCO Group, Inc. on August 4,
2003 seeking declaratory judgment of non-infringement of
copyrights and declaratory judgment of no misappropriation of
trade secrets, as well as accusing SCO of false advertising in
violation of section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, deceptive trade
practices, unfair competition, tortious interference with
prospective business opportunities and trade libel and
disparagement. Judge Sue Robinson in the U.S. District Court in
Delaware has stayed the case pending the outcome of the SCO vs.
IBM case.
 
 
October 4, 2004
Red Hat, Inc. v. The SCO Group, Inc., C.A. No. 03-772 (SLR)
(http://www.sco.com/redhat/20041004_rh_rh-v-sco.pdf)

May 4, 2004
SCO's Opposition to Red Hat's Motion for Reconsideration
Statement of Facts
(http://www.sco.com/redhat/20040504_rh_opposition-to-rh.pdf)

April 20, 2004
Memorandum of Law in Support of Red hat, Inc.'s Motion for
Reconsideration
(http://www.sco.com/redhat/20040420_rh_memo-of-law.pdf)

April 20, 2004
Motion for Reconsideration
(http://www.sco.com/redhat/20040420_rh_memo-of-reconsideration.pdf)

April 6, 2004
Memorandum Order
(http://www.sco.com/redhat/20040406_rh_memo-order.pdf)

February 26, 2004
Reply of Red Hat Inc. in Support of Motion to Supplement the
Record (http://www.sco.com/redhat/20040226_rh_reply-to-rh.pdf)

February 11, 2004
Motion to Supplement the Record
(http://www.sco.com/redhat/20040211_rh_motion-to-supplement.pdf)

October 10, 2003
Defendant The SCO Group, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of its
Motion to Dismiss
(http://www.sco.com/redhat/20031010_rh_defendant-reply.pdf)

October 6, 2003
Stipulation and Order to Extend Time
(http://www.sco.com/redhat/20031006_rh_stipulation-order-to-extend.pdf)

October 1, 2003
Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion
to Dismiss
(http://www.sco.com/redhat/20031001_rh_motion-to-stay.pdf)

September 30, 2003
Red Hat, Inc. v. The SCO Group, Inc., C.A. No. 03-772-SLR
(http://www.sco.com/redhat/20030930_rh_rh-v-sco.pdf)

September 29, 2003
Red Hat's Memorandum in Opposition to SCO's Motion to Dismiss
(http://www.sco.com/redhat/20030929_rh_memo-in-opposition.pdf)

September 15, 2003
Defendant the SCO Group, Inc.'s Opening Brief in Support of its
Motion to Dismiss
(http://www.sco.com/redhat/20030915_rh_opening-brief.pdf)

August 4, 2003 
Red Hat files suit against The SCO Group, Inc.
(http://www.sco.com/redhat/20030804_rh_rh-files-suit.pdf)


-- 

DRM is Theft!  We are the Stakeholders!

New Yorkers for Fair Use
http://www.nyfairuse.org

[CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc

I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or
distribution of this incidentally recorded communication. 
Original authorship should be attributed reasonably, but only so
far as such an expectation might hold for usual practice in
ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of
exclusive rights.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]