[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Dolibarr-dev] Bugtraker
From: |
Jean-François Ferry |
Subject: |
Re: [Dolibarr-dev] Bugtraker |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Mar 2014 01:32:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131104 Icedove/17.0.10 |
Le 07/03/2014 08:27, address@hidden a écrit :
>> We could use Tuleap API (https://tuleap.net/soap/) and integrate an
>> interface into dolibarr website.
>
> Why redo the wheel ?
Agree with you. Why discuss a new bugtracker while we barely use the
existing one?
>
> Dolibbar is not a bugtracker
Obviously :)
I thought a simple form (user friendly) on dolibarr website and data
would be put into doliforge by using API.
>
> Tuleap problem, in my case, is just not do to collaborative project.
> Actually I follow project from github repository and sometime propose
> a patch from this instance.
>
> Tuleap looks great to have many closed project. And don't loooks to
> provide any collaborative advantage. I'm not sure if this list all
> people are an Tuleap account active.
Tuleap also provide other tools as mailing list, wiki, instant messaging...
Some stats from doliforge :
Users statistics:
Registered active or restricted site users: 828
Per status: 828 active, 0 restricted, 5 hold, 54 deleted, 28
validated, 0 pending, total : 915
Per activities:
Last 24 hours: 6
Last week: 21
Last month: 85
Last 3 months: 170
>
> Redmine, bug genie, trac, blood hood, are open source and provide
> collaborative aspects.
AMHA the problem would be the same with redmine or another tools. I
think it is not a problem with the tool but its visibility and
integration into other Dolibarr tools.
For a while I would play with the API Tuleap but I'm stuck with Joomla...
>
> Cheers
>
> Km
> PS sorry for my english, i try to it simple but it's really not my language :)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dolibarr-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
>
[Dolibarr-dev] Bugtraker, Cedric GROSS, 2014/03/06