|
From: | Christophe Battarel |
Subject: | Re: [Dolibarr-dev] Dolibarr-dev Digest, Vol 163, Issue 6 |
Date: | Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:34:50 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 |
hello, just a few words to clarify some things from my point of view : 1) no more things to say about release rythm; i do not understand why dynamism is better than stability but i can admit it's the way the world works now (buzz rather than acts). 2) user point of view not revealed ? did someone ask them ? 3) merging of external modules into core ? i thought that Laurent said once he does not want anymore new module into core to keep its stability and i totally agree with him on this point - small but good is better ;-) 4) communication ? a harsh work to do... first thing should be to be active on the user's forums; reading github is a pain, even more for users ! As often i think that dolibarr addresses two different kinds of people and we have to go with it because it's a good thing (mix of little and bigger companies with different points of view, different usages, different needs, etc). If someone want to do it its own way because he thinks it's better, he may fork the project and it is also good for everyone. My two hundred dollars Le 24/10/2016 à 14:39, Hubert Andriolo
a écrit :
--
--------------------------------------- Christophe Battarel Responsable technique Altairis +33 (0)9 52 71 70 96 Altairis - Blog - Modules Dolibarr - Twitter Financez vos projets avec Dolipro |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |