[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Re: (Unmangled) Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz at O'Reilly confere
From: |
Lloyd Llewellyn |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Re: (Unmangled) Craig Mundie/Dave Stutz at O'Reilly conference (was:[DotGNU... |
Date: |
30 Jul 2001 18:36:26 -0400 |
> Mundie said "I am just like you, there are
> some things I dont like" and Tim O'Rielly said "well, there isnt much I
> like about it at all"
Mundie looked about as comfortable as an investment banker at a Star
Trek convention throughout the proceedings.
I'm still unclear on what MS can and cannot do with patents. I realize
dotGNU is not supposed to be a drop-in replacement for .NET, but are
there things MS can do legally to make dotGNU irrelevant as an
alternative to .NET?