[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]a segfault on anonymous bit field
From: |
Rhys Weatherley |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]a segfault on anonymous bit field |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:40:16 +1000 |
Gopal V wrote:
> would be incorrect if I omitted to add the first anonymous bitfield ?
> (my fix adds a bitfield named "" to provide the necessary padding)
Ah! I see the problem now. I'll investigate a better solution.
Bit fields with "" names will be problematic elsewhere, so I need
to come up with a better solution than scanning previous BitField
definitions for the new position.
Cheers,
Rhys.