[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Does cscc need a pedantic mode ?
From: |
Stephen Compall |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Does cscc need a pedantic mode ? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:12:28 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021121 |
Gopal V wrote:
Ok ... having said all that .. do we need a 'pedantic' mode for complete
and total subservience to what MS CSC does ?
Maybe a *ECMA* compliance mode would better be called -pedantic, and an
MS mode would be called -inferior ;) only serious. As long as it's not
the default, like -ansi and -pedantic aren't defaults for gcc....
--
Stephen Compall
Also known as S11001001
DotGNU `Contributor' -- http://dotgnu.org
But how you can encourage greater production of works in the 1920's by
extending copyright today escapes me, unless they have a time machine
somewhere.
-- RMS, "Copyright and Globalization in the Age of Computer
Networks", on retroactive copyright extension by the
U.S. Government