[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list
From: |
Stephen Compall |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:02:38 -0600 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 04:55 am, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
> Could we trial sending the bugs to "address@hidden" for a few
> weeks, and then split it off if people start to complain? Perhaps
> even create a "address@hidden" for general pnet
> discussion and bugs if it seems worthwhile.
A trial basis sounds good, with an option to close if/when the bug
volume becomes too overwhelming :)
I really like the second suggestion; having security architecture
discussions mixed in with the latest on ia64 build problems is a
little...too eclectic?
- --
Stephen Compall - Also known as S11001001
DotGNU `Contributor' -- http://dotgnu.org
Jabber ID: address@hidden
"Control over the use of one's ideas" really constitutes control over
other people's lives; and it is usually used to make their lives more
difficult.
-- RMS, "GNU Manifesto"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+c6MC2AceYinZ4EgRAhilAKCrcA+R6aSlAO6wvkdO+InNY3FLwgCfQMmA
pyYTKhhmhq36wFFmjnQfaTM=
=PtLj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, James Michael DuPont, 2003/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, Norbert Bollow, 2003/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, Norbert Bollow, 2003/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, Peter Minten, 2003/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, Ian Game, 2003/03/28
- Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, Gopal V, 2003/03/28
- [DotGNU]netbsd package, pancake, 2003/03/28
- Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list,
Stephen Compall <=
Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, Gopal V, 2003/03/12