emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#38011: closed (27.0.50; [PATCH] WIP on allowing Gnus backends to ret


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#38011: closed (27.0.50; [PATCH] WIP on allowing Gnus backends to return header data directly)
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 21:13:01 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:12:37 -0800
with message-id <87h7ne0x16.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
and subject line Re: bug#38011: 27.0.50; [PATCH] WIP on allowing Gnus backends 
to return header data directly
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #38011,
regarding 27.0.50; [PATCH] WIP on allowing Gnus backends to return header data 
directly
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
38011: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38011
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 27.0.50; [PATCH] WIP on allowing Gnus backends to return header data directly Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 14:34:06 -0700
Right now, Gnus backends return article header data by writing it in a
parseable format into the `nntp-server-buffer', and returning one of the
symbols 'nov or 'headers, indicating how the data should be parsed.

This isn't great because it requires backends to first munge their data
into a format that looks like the NNTP format, which is then parsed
again, which is an extra layer of data transformation. It also makes use
of the `nntp-server-buffer', which is something I'd like to work on
reducing because it causes problems with threading and introduces
potential encoding bugs.

This patch provides the possibility for backends to return their own
headers (ie a list of vectors), though it doesn't actually change any of
the backends to do that -- that will be another patch.

I have one question at this stage: the 'nov or 'headers value gets
stored into the `gnus-headers-retrieved-by' variable. That variable is
later checked in a couple of places like so:

      (when (and gnus-fetch-old-headers
                 (eq gnus-headers-retrieved-by 'nov))
        (if (eq gnus-fetch-old-headers 'invisible)
            (gnus-build-all-threads)
          (gnus-build-old-threads)))

If the variable is 'headers, the `gnus-build-*-threads' functions don't
get called at all.

What's the difference between 'nov and 'headers, and why can we build
threads in one case and not the other? If backends were to return their
own headers, what value should they return? I'll also note that the nnir
version of this function returns 'nov regardless of what the "real"
backend function returned -- why is that?

I would love to use some other, more direct, heuristic to decide about
building threads or not, and get rid of the
'nov/'headers/gnus-headers-retrieved-by stuff altogether, but I don't
yet know how to do that.

Eric

Attachment: 0001-WIP-on-allowing-Gnus-backends-to-return-headers-dire.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#38011: 27.0.50; [PATCH] WIP on allowing Gnus backends to return header data directly Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:12:37 -0800 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:

>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 21:00:36 -0800, Eric Abrahamsen 
>>>>>> <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> said:
>
>     Eric> Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>     >> On 01/05/21 09:47 AM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>     >>> Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>     >>> 
>     >>>> Morally the same: the agent has its own 
> `gnus-agent-uncached-articles'
>     >>>> function, which consults the .agentview file, so it uses that 
> instead of
>     >>>> `gnus-sorted-difference'. But the same idea.
>     >>> 
>     >>> Right.
>
>     Eric> [...]
>
>     >> Anyway, I'll keep looking at this patch for a bit, and see if I can 
> find
>     >> any more problems with it.
>
>     Eric> I found a couple more, in agent file writing, and have pushed a 
> commit
>     Eric> fixing that. So far as I can tell this now works as intended. I've 
> run
>     Eric> side-by-side comparisons of master and this feature branch, messing 
> with
>     Eric> the cache and the agent, and feel fairly confident that behavior is 
> the
>     Eric> same in terms of header fetching, and files written to disk. I 
> think I'd
>     Eric> feel okay merging this, but would also be happy to let it mellow 
> longer.
>
> I think previous experience shows that the only way to find bugs in
> this kind of code is to foist it on us :-)

Bombs away, then!


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]