bug#12299: closed (24.1; no byte compiler warning for inline function call with too few arguments)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 7 Dec 2021 00:36:36 +0100
with message-id 
<CADwFkmnY=jeHR+H3MQ2f4AVyZaqhnUYB=5SGiT_4ac=rsQe7Hg@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#12299: 24.1; no byte compiler warning for inline 
function call with too few arguments
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #12299,
regarding 24.1; no byte compiler warning for inline function call with too few 
arguments
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
12299: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12299
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.1; no byte compiler warning for inline function call with too few	arguments
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:14:06 -0500
>
>
>
>
> cat > foo.el << EOF
> (defsubst foo (a b))
> (foo t)
> EOF
>
> Byte-compile the above file. The Emacs 24.1 byte compiler does not
> complain that the inline function foo is called with too few arguments.
> Emacs 23.1 complains
>
>   foo.el:2:1:Warning: attempt to open-code `anonymous lambda' with
>     too few arguments
>
> till it aborts with
>
>   foo.el:2:1:Error: Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size
>
> which I do not find very appropriate either.
>
>
> In GNU Emacs 24.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.20.1)
>  of 2012-06-10 on regnitz
> Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10706000
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#12299: 24.1; no byte compiler warning for inline function call with too few arguments
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 7 Dec 2021 00:36:36 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org> writes:
>
> > Thanks for testing it -- pushed to master, slightly simplified
> > (somehow I completely missed the existence of `func-arity`)
>
> It seems like this bug was fixed, so I'm closing it now.
>
> commit 109ca1bd00b56ba66b123b505d8c2187fded0ef7
> Author: Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org>
> Date:   Thu Jul 22 15:00:17 2021 +0200
>
>     Warn about arity errors in inlining calls (bug#12299)
>
>
> --- End Message ---