emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#52428: closed (28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is unbound


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#52428: closed (28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is unbound on MS-DOS)
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 07:52:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 12 Dec 2021 15:51:43 +0800
with message-id <87ilvuz2eo.fsf@yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: bug#52428: 28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is 
unbound on MS-DOS
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #52428,
regarding 28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is unbound on MS-DOS
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
52428: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=52428
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is unbound on MS-DOS Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 18:53:15 +0800
On MS-DOS, start eshell, and type any command that will result in a
synchronous subprocess being started:

c:/djgpp/bin $ djecho hello

Eshell will complain that `processp' is unbound, because there are two
uses of `processp' in `eshell-eval-command' that need to be replaced
with `eshell-processp'.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#52428: 28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is unbound on MS-DOS Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 15:51:43 +0800 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.60 (gnu/linux)
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:06:35 +0800
>> 
>> > c:/djgpp/bin $ djecho hello
>> >
>> > Eshell will complain that `processp' is unbound, because there are two
>> > uses of `processp' in `eshell-eval-command' that need to be replaced
>> > with `eshell-processp'.
>> 
>> If nobody minds, I'll fix this on the release branch by replacing those
>> calls with `eshell-processp'.
>> 
>> Eli, is that okay?
>
> Yes, of course.  Eshell should never directly call 'processp', except
> perhaps in code that makes no sense and isn't called on MS-DOS.

Done, and I'm closing this bug.  Thanks!


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]