emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#52565: closed ([PATCH] gnu: emacs-telega-server: Fix build)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#52565: closed ([PATCH] gnu: emacs-telega-server: Fix build)
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 07:57:03 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:56:31 +0100
with message-id <87mtkz7jgw.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
and subject line Re: [bug#52565] [PATCH] gnu: emacs-telega-server: Fix build
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #52565,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: emacs-telega-server: Fix build
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
52565: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=52565
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-telega-server: Fix build Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 05:58:35 +0000
* gnu/packages/emacs-xyz (emacs-telega-server)[arguments]:
use ungexp instead of unqoute.
---
 gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
index cb70c5dc9d..ba0e800743 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
@@ -26702,7 +26702,7 @@ (define-public emacs-telega-server
       (arguments
        (list
         #:make-flags
-        #~(list (string-append "CC=" ,(cc-for-target))
+        #~(list (string-append "CC=" #$(cc-for-target))
                 (string-append "INSTALL_PREFIX=" #$output "/bin"))
         #:phases
         #~(modify-phases %standard-phases
-- 
2.34.0



-- 

Aleksandr Vityazev



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#52565] [PATCH] gnu: emacs-telega-server: Fix build Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:56:31 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
Hello,

Aleksandr Vityazev <avityazev@posteo.org> writes:

> * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz (emacs-telega-server)[arguments]:
> use ungexp instead of unqoute.

Applied. Thank you!

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]