emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#52336: closed ([PATCH 1/2] gnu: register notcurses.scm in local.mk)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#52336: closed ([PATCH 1/2] gnu: register notcurses.scm in local.mk)
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 18:22:02 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:20:59 -0500
with message-id <YcynCwNzbkaQevdN@jasmine.lan>
and subject line Re: [bug#52335] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: add package notcurses.scm
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #52335,
regarding [PATCH 1/2] gnu: register notcurses.scm in local.mk
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
52335: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=52335
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: register notcurses.scm in local.mk Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 02:00:01 +0700
---
 gnu/local.mk | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/gnu/local.mk b/gnu/local.mk
index b91d6eaa62..54e6dd422d 100644
--- a/gnu/local.mk
+++ b/gnu/local.mk
@@ -422,6 +422,7 @@ GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES =                                \
   %D%/packages/ninja.scm                       \
   %D%/packages/node.scm                                \
   %D%/packages/node-xyz.scm                    \
+  %D%/packages/notcurses.scm                   \
   %D%/packages/noweb.scm                       \
   %D%/packages/nss.scm                         \
   %D%/packages/ntp.scm                         \
-- 
2.33.1




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#52335] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: add package notcurses.scm Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:20:59 -0500
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 12:48:38PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> I found the use of DFSG_BUILD to be confusing, so I asked upstream:
> 
> https://github.com/dankamongmen/notcurses/issues/2508

They helpfully clarified that we want this option to be ON. So, I've
done that, partially migrated the package to the "new style" [0], and
pushed as 7022eb6ea0f3be2f0eb58617c607ce34dfbff90a.

Thanks a lot for the contribution!

[0] I only changed the inputs to the new style. Changing the package's
arguments field is future work.
https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2021/the-big-change/


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]