bug#56846: closed ([PATCH] FeatherNotes package )

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 04 Aug 2022 09:23:20 +0800
with message-id <87edxw2453.fsf_-_@envs.net>
and subject line Re: bug#56846: [PATCH] FeatherNotes package 
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #56846,
regarding [PATCH] FeatherNotes package 
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
56846: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=56846
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] FeatherNotes package Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 01:50:23 +0300

Hello!

Here is my patch to add FeatherNotes package to guix. I upstream it from 
PantherX channel, hence 3 copyright lines.
I build it against Qt5 as Qt6 support in FeatherNotes is experimental and is 
not recommended for daily usage yet.

Thank you in advance for your feedback.
Have a nice day!

0001-gnu-feathernotes-new-package.patch
Description: Binary data

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#56846: [PATCH] FeatherNotes package 
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 04 Aug 2022 09:23:20 +0800
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Pavel Shlyak <p.shlyak@pantherx.org> writes:
>
> >> Maybe "notes manager" is better than "notes-manager"?
> >
> > I copied the this from the original README 
> > (https://github.com/tsujan/FeatherNotes/blob/master/README.md)
> >
> >> Why here are 2020 and 2021 changes?
> >
> > Because I upstream this package from another repo where it was packaged long 
> > time ago.
> >
> >> Seem missing a "," after "editable tables».
> >
> > Yes
> >
> >> When adding a new package, the "tradition" is:
> >
> > I would be happy if it was edited during merge.
>
> Done, thank you!
>
>
> --- End Message ---